From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10798 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2009 09:30:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 10780 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Sep 2009 09:30:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_55,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hel.is.scarlet.be (HELO hel.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:05 +0000 Received: from [172.17.1.10] (ip-81-11-242-113.dsl.scarlet.be [81.11.242.113]) by hel.is.scarlet.be (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8D9TfJK020045; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:29:42 +0200 Subject: Re: Build question From: Danny Backx Reply-To: danny.backx@scarlet.be To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion> <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org> <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion> <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org> <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion> <1250931899.11282.142.camel@pavilion> <83skfkfa4n.fsf@gnu.org> <1251095160.16357.352.camel@pavilion> <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion> <83zl9e8nro.fsf@gnu.org> <1251835928.6106.124.camel@pavilion> <83vdk281xb.fsf@gnu.org> <1252143311.6106.252.camel@pavilion> <83eiql4blw.fsf@gnu.org> <1252440932.6106.336.camel@pavilion> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1252834313.8804.51.camel@pavilion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: hel 20001; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00381.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:57 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Danny" == Danny Backx writes: > Danny> Index: include/filenames.h > > include is part of libiberty, so you'll need approval from the libiberty > maintainers. > > Given that more programs than gdb use BFD and libiberty, you will at the > very least need to put have_dos_based_file_system elsewhere (i.e., in > libiberty). Who are the libiberty maintainers ? Is this part of another GNU project ? Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info