From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4226 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2009 20:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 4218 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Aug 2009 20:38:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from forward6.yandex.ru (HELO forward6.yandex.ru) (77.88.60.125) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:38:15 +0000 Received: from smtp7.yandex.ru (smtp7.yandex.ru [77.88.61.55]) by forward6.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id E0E81DCA2B0; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:38:12 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [91.78.132.9]) by smtp7.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTPA id B05901CF8113; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:38:12 +0400 (MSD) Subject: Re: [RFC] multi branch merge From: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <1250707524.2730.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0lG+RiEGKAqizXGMco8p" Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1251405487.2912.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1251405492 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp7.yandex.ru Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00493.txt.bz2 --=-0lG+RiEGKAqizXGMco8p Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 682 =F7 =F0=CE=C4, 24/08/2009 =D7 17:07 -0600, Tom Tromey =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > >>>>> "Nickolay" =3D=3D Nickolay V Shmyrev writes: >=20 > Nickolay> Here is the preliminary work on merge of the > Nickolay> multiprocess-20081120-branch to current trunk. Comments are > Nickolay> appreciated. >=20 > I think this branch is dead and Pedro has a newer patch series for this > that has been sent to the list a couple of times. >=20 > It might be worth your time to try out those patches to see how they do. Thanks for the info, Tom.=20 Newer patchset is indeed better and I've updated the wiki page at least. Though there still problems with new function inlining stuff. --=-0lG+RiEGKAqizXGMco8p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: =?koi8-r?Q?=FC=D4=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=DE=C1=D3=D4=D8?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=D1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=C1=CE=C1?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=C3=C9=C6=D2=CF=D7=CF=CA?= =?koi8-r?Q?_=D0=CF=C4=D0=C9=D3=D8=C0?= Content-length: 197 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkqW7q4ACgkQLCDh4YwOt9nr9ACgj0thGZvZNiTN9e3X4QKals2J 5C0AnRetBSCieBFxoWTWzNr8a2qft6te =wWNg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0lG+RiEGKAqizXGMco8p--