Ping again.

On Mon, 2009-07-27, Danny Backx wrote:
> Ping ?
> 
> On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:33 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:55 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
> > > It looks like ReadProcessMemory refuses to read from an address
> beyond
> > > the pointer, but it does work from the pointer itself.
> > > 
> > > I've changed my code such that it loops, and tries to read a
> bigger
> > > chunk of memory at each iteration.
> > > 
> > > I'm not bothering you with that code or its debug output right
> now.
> > > 
> > > In that way, the code appears to work, and it complies with the
> > > documentation saying not to read more than required.
> > > 
> > > Shall I submit a new patch based on this ?
> > > 
> > >     Danny
> > 
> > Ignore that question, here's the patch.
> > 
> > Please comment on its contents and on my adherence to the coding
> > standards. Apologies for that, I seem to have a hard time learning
> that.
> > 
> >       Danny
> > 
> > 2009-07-08  Danny Backx  <dannybackx@users.sourceforge.net>
> > 
> >       * win32-low.c (get_image_name) : Work around ReadProcessMemory
> >       failure when reading at arbitrary addresses.
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info