On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 22:58 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009 22:07:19, Danny Backx wrote:
> > 
> > > Is the rest of my patch acceptable or are there things I need to
> > > address ?
> > >
> 
> Did you get to confirm what really that ERROR_PIPE_NOT_CONNECTED
> is about?
> 
>  http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00373.html
> 
> Could you post an updated, cleaned up patch, without any extra
> unnecessary bits removed, along with change log entry, using
> 'cvs diff -up'?

Attached. Comments, as always, welcome.

	Danny
-- 
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info