From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20887 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 21:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 20875 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2009 21:07:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_55,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eir.is.scarlet.be (HELO eir.is.scarlet.be) (193.74.71.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:07:29 +0000 Received: from [172.17.1.10] (ip-81-11-242-24.dsl.scarlet.be [81.11.242.24]) by eir.is.scarlet.be (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5UL7C3e010831; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:07:12 +0200 Subject: Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE From: Danny Backx Reply-To: danny.backx@scarlet.be To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1245577804.15871.48.camel@pavilion> References: <1244903385.20290.9.camel@pavilion> <1244969225.20290.59.camel@pavilion> <1244972893.20290.71.camel@pavilion> <200906141523.36328.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1245577804.15871.48.camel@pavilion> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1246396039.15871.152.camel@pavilion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-scarlet.be-Metrics: eir 20001; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00894.txt.bz2 Ping ? Danny On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 11:50 +0200, Danny Backx wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 15:23 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > [omitted discussion between Pedro and me about what to do with setjmp] > > Read the code again. It is used in more cases than just exiting. In > > any case, this would be going too far. Replacements or an alternative > > similar mechanism is in order. > > I've borrowed setjmp/longjmp assembler code from newlib and copied them > into mingw/mingwex. So I was now able to compile gdbserver without the > #if 0 lines to remove its calls to setjmp or longjmp . > > Is the rest of my patch acceptable or are there things I need to > address ? > > Once this gdbserver stuff is done, I'll come up with the gdb part of my > work. > > Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info