From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10588 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2009 17:54:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 10579 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2009 17:54:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp02.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:54:03 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n51IK2hE029720 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:20:02 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n51IrD6b3940436 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:53:13 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n51Hrwlk026664 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:53:59 -0300 Received: from [9.8.9.208] ([9.8.9.208]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n51Hrw1x026629; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:53:58 -0300 Subject: Re: RFC: add ability to "source" Python code From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com, drow@false.org, pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Paul Pluzhnikov In-Reply-To: References: <20090211220118.GE13021@adacore.com> <20090212062654.GG13021@adacore.com> <20090213022246.GA5401@adacore.com> <20090217000746.GA3812@adacore.com> <20090219200536.GA25486@adacore.com> <1243828612.9045.9.camel@hactar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1243878835.8668.1.camel@hactar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Em Seg, 2009-06-01 às 11:45 -0400, Eli Zaretskii escreveu: > > Is this good enough for everybody? > > Fine with me. Awesome! > However, I would suggest "strict" instead of "hard". Sounds good. If others agree I'll make the change. BTW I agree that "on" and "auto" don't fit very well. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center