From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21703 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2009 22:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 21693 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Feb 2009 22:12:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp03.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:12:49 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n16KbHav017781 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:37:17 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n16Lc6ht3723314 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:38:06 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n16Kcc1q021137 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:38:38 -0200 Received: from [9.18.201.230] ([9.18.201.230]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n16KcckH021129; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:38:38 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFC][python] Add support for commands implemented in Python From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: References: <1233580405.7000.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1233873605.14735.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:12:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1233952717.14735.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 El vie, 06-02-2009 a las 08:18 +0200, Eli Zaretskii escribió: > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:40:05 -0200 > > > > gdb/doc/ > > 2009-02-05 Tom Tromey > > > > * gdb.texinfo (Python API): Add entry for Commands In Python. > > (Commands In Python): New node. > > Thanks. My only comment to the new text is that perhaps the COMMAND_* > constants should have followed the respective GDB command classes more > closely. For example, COMMAND_RUNNING instead of COMMAND_RUN, > COMMAND_DATA instead of COMMAND_VARS, etc. But that's a minor > concern, especially if you had a good reason to deviate from the GDB > interactive nomenclature. I like your idea, I'm not sure if there was good reason for the deviation other than that it was already present in the GDB source code already. Tom, what do you think? -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center