From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7603 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2009 18:00:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7589 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2009 18:00:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp02.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:00:09 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0SI66NX010765 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:06:06 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0SIxWa23285074 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:59:32 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0SI03uF002193 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:00:03 -0200 Received: from [9.8.8.44] ([9.8.8.44]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0SI02dg002179; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:00:03 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFC][python] Fixes and improvements to gdb.Value. From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <1230949500.8380.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1231024147.8380.166.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:16:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1233161666.16553.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 El lun, 05-01-2009 a las 14:00 -0700, Tom Tromey escribió: > Thiago -- I know it is kind of a pain, but would you mind putting any > changes you make back onto the Python branch? Or if you can't do it, > let me know and I will try to. I'd like to keep the branch > "canonical" so that we can diff against mainline to see what Python > bits ought to be merged. I've been doing that. If you find some discrepancy, please let me know so I can fix it. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center