From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17358 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2009 19:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17295 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2009 19:35:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp01.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:35:30 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0QJdnNm017714 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:39:49 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0QKYulZ3764462 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:34:56 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0QJZQYx010701 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:35:26 -0200 Received: from [9.18.203.38] ([9.18.203.38]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0QJZPYi010670; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:35:26 -0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] catch syscall -- try 4 -- Architecture-dependent part From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, teawater In-Reply-To: <200901261929.n0QJTaar023847@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <200901261929.n0QJTaar023847@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1232998513.26873.48.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 20:29 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > I don't think it's a real trouble, but if you want I can resubmit the patches. > > It doesn't matter much, but in case you commit them separately, each single > commit should still result in a source tree that compiles and works ... Hi Ulrich, All right. I've only splitted the patch into four logical patches in order to make things easy for the reviewers. If I commit them, I'll put everyhing on a single commit (mainly because my "logical patches", if applied partially, don't result in a source tree that compiles and works). Thanks, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil