From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17519 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2009 16:23:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17479 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2009 16:23:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:22:42 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036F0390311 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:17:09 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0GHMAQt3948762 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:22:10 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0GGMdkN028152 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:22:39 -0200 Received: from [9.18.196.16] ([9.18.196.16]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0GGMd3a028149; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:22:39 -0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] catch syscall -- try 3 -- Introduction From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: teawater , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20090116145608.GA14474@caradoc.them.org> References: <1226987110.5454.31.camel@miki> <1227568560.18828.0.camel@miki> <1228851299.1697.0.camel@miki> <1229977697.27356.4.camel@miki> <20090116145608.GA14474@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1232122953.6191.18.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 09:56 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If I followed correctly, Sergio got some useful feedback from Jan > K. on the archer list. Sergio, once that's resolved, could you > resubmit? I agree with Jan about getting rid of the entry breakpoint. Hi Daniel, You're right, Jan gave me useful feedback about the catch syscall patch. I'm preparing the new version for re-submission; it shouldn't take too long. Thanks, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil