From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32229 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2008 19:56:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32207 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Dec 2008 19:56:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:55:32 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2729D32C1C9 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:50:27 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mBTKt1pS3891310 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:55:01 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mBTJtTmZ011268 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:55:29 -0200 Received: from [9.8.13.71] ([9.8.13.71]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mBTJtSsW011232; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:55:28 -0200 Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20081222202532.GA31896@caradoc.them.org> References: <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki> <494AC2D3.9090705@vmware.com> <1229702034.6602.18.camel@miki> <1229703833.6602.28.camel@miki> <1229960072.27356.0.camel@miki> <1229975651.27356.2.camel@miki> <20081222202532.GA31896@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1230580513.27356.28.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00453.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 15:25 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Or should we fold this into "info inferior" and make it work for other > kinds of inferiors? So, just to make sure I understood correctly, the patch I sent is not ready to be accepted, right? It would be helpful if you could tell me what should I modify in my specific patch :-). Create the "info inferior" command? Or the "info core" command? Thanks in advance, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil