Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles

Mark Kettenis
2008-12-22T22:52:54Z

> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:19:06 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:25:32 -0500
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio_Durigan_J=FAnior?= <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
> > tromey@redhat.com, msnyder@vmware.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
> > gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > I wonder if we should rename or redefine "info proc". It is currently
> > /proc specific, so Sergio's new work for core files doesn't belong
> > there. But while it exists we can't reasonably add a separate "info
> > process".
> >
> > Or should we fold this into "info inferior" and make it work for other
> > kinds of inferiors?
>
> I'm okay with both of these ways, but "info process" doesn't sound
> like a good name for core files, IMO.

Agreed