Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-12-22T20:26:18Z

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:03:19PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I thought we later agreed on having something like "info core", with
> "info proc map" calling that?

I wonder if we should rename or redefine "info proc". It is currently
/proc specific, so Sergio's new work for core files doesn't belong
there. But while it exists we can't reasonably add a separate "info
process".

Or should we fold this into "info inferior" and make it work for other
kinds of inferiors?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery