From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21063 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2008 18:51:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 21049 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2008 18:51:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:50:17 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E24E390088 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:46:18 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mBIJnlmw3649544 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:49:47 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mBIIoDlm026737 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:13 -0200 Received: from [9.18.238.245] ([9.18.238.245]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mBIIoDxg026722; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:13 -0200 Subject: Re: RFC: "info proc map" for corefiles From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200812181846.mBIIkTgK015985@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> References: <1229620702.6602.12.camel@miki> <200812181846.mBIIkTgK015985@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:51:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1229626216.6602.15.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 Hello Mark, On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 19:46 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > This looks pretty cool, but I think having this as "info proc" > subcommand is wrong: > > (gdb) help info > ... > info proc -- Show /proc process information about any running process > ... > > Corefiles have nothing to do with /proc and many operating systems > don't even have such a thing. All right, good point. Do you have any suggestion for this? Should I create another class of command? Regards, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil