Re: [PATCH 0/4] catch syscall -- try 3 -- Introduction

["Sérgio Durigan Júnior" <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi,

Ping again.

Thanks.

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:16 -0200, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> Hello guys,
> 
> Ping. :-)
> 
> []s
> 
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 03:45 -0200, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> > Hi, it's me again :-)
> > 
> > This is the third attempt to push this patch upstream :-). I've
> > basically reworked everything that you asked me, so I think things are
> > pretty much better now. Basically, the changes are:
> > 
> > - Incremented the documentation (as suggested by Eli)
> > 
> > - Fixed some bugs
> > 
> > - Now you can catch as many syscalls as you want in one single command
> > (thanks to Tom Tromey!)
> > 
> > - Create a "linux-tdep.[ch]", and put the common syscall functions there
> > (suggestion by Daniel Jacobowits)
> > 
> > - Put the syscall_state inside lwp_info (as requested by Pedro)
> > 
> > ... and other minor changes. Unfortunately (only for Eli, apparently), I
> > decided to keep the mechanism the way it is, so you'll still find
> > syscalls being stored as numbers in this version of the patch. That's
> > not personal; I only thought that people in general were happy with the
> > way I did.
> > 
> > It's also good to mention that the support for x86_64 arch is almost
> > done (I have one little regression to solve). That's for you, Phil ;-).
> > 
> > Ok, I'm tired (3:30am here) so I won't write too much. I'd appreciate
> > your review :-).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
-- 
Sérgio Durigan Júnior
Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - LTC
IBM Brazil