From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27821 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2008 04:25:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27765 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2008 04:25:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:24:11 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACAE32C020 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:21:14 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mAK5NivQ2994242 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:23:44 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mAK4O869027705 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:24:08 -0200 Received: from [9.8.3.184] ([9.8.3.184]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAK4O0tL027564; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:24:04 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 8/10 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Michael Snyder Cc: teawater , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <4924C55D.2050802@vmware.com> References: <4924C55D.2050802@vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1227155039.28256.115.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00538.txt.bz2 El mié, 19-11-2008 a las 18:03 -0800, Michael Snyder escribió: > Hmm, I'm not the master of protocol here (Joel?), but my impression > is that we would prefer to see the diffs against the current CVS, not > against the previous patch. Actually, he sent the diff against CVS as an attachment, and a diff against the previous patch inline. > If there's important changes since the previous patch, could you > maybe include a brief description of the changes? >From what I could see, he made many messages be printed only if record_debug is set, and expanded all case A..B instances, to be ISO C compliant. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center