From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4406 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2008 15:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 4349 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2008 15:05:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:04:33 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E4532C106 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:02:28 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mA4F46Ti3604696 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 12:04:06 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mA4F4QQp003921 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:04:26 -0200 Received: from [9.8.9.146] ([9.8.9.146]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mA4F4PoB003894; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:04:26 -0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] 'catch syscall' feature -- XML support part From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20081104134708.GA10644@caradoc.them.org> References: <1225773086.24532.55.camel@miki> <200811041335.mA4DZtYH016463@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20081104134708.GA10644@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:05:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1225811056.32321.9.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 08:47 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:35:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Hmm, I haven't looked at the code yes, but this is all Linux-specific > > stuff, so this should be reflected in the names of those files. > > Yes please. We should be able to do non-Linux syscalls too, but > they'll require different data files. > > Sergio, while you're moving them, could they go in a subdirectory > please? Maybe gdb/syscalls/ ? It doesn't need to have a separate > ChangeLog or Makefile or anything like that. IIUC, you're asking me to put the XML files in gdb/syscalls/ right? Well, they are already there :-). I think the correct approach to solve this problem is renaming the XML files to something like "i386-linux-syscalls.xml", isn't it? Regards, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil