From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: msalter@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: set/show remotestopbits Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:01:00 -0000 Message-id: <1225-Wed26Sep2001200214+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200109261227.f8QCRjr27498@deneb.localdomain> <1858-Wed26Sep2001164321+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200109261502.f8QF23T27912@deneb.localdomain> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00357.html > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 11:02:03 -0400 > From: Mark Salter > > I'm going to take up Fernando's suggestion for the syntax. I'll look > at completion then. Thanks! > > In any case, please also send something for gdb.texinfo to document > > the new command. > > Most (if not all) of the "set/show remote foo" commands seem to be > undocumented in the manual. I've just checked in a quite old snapshot, and found 64 set commands, half of which was documented in the manual. I wouldn't call that "most", let alone "all". In any case, the fact that there's a number of undocumented commands does not mean we should add to that number. > Seemed like standard practice... Not since I became responsible for the manual maintenance.