From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16954 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2008 19:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 16944 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Oct 2008 19:14:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:13:20 +0000 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.8.31.16]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0406117F7C3 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:57:06 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id m96JD8N02453642 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:13:08 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m96JDGmh021017 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:13:16 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.184] (dyn531995.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.184]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m96JDGF4021003 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:13:16 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] catch syscall' feature -- Architecture-dependent part From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Durigan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FAnior?= To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1222798412.30389.24.camel@miki> References: <1222798412.30389.24.camel@miki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1223320501.7030.1.camel@miki> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:13 -0300, Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote: > This is the architecture-dependent part of the patch. > > Because of that problem in PPC64 (see message 0/4), probably I'll have > to edit this patch to make sure that the architecture supports syscall > catchpoints. IMO, this can be done checking the > 'gdbarch_get_syscall_number_p'. I think I'll let this modification to > the second review of this patch :-). FYI, the problem with PPC64 is already fixed in this patch. I have now run the regression test and everything seems ok. So if this part of the patch is accepted, there will be no problems in PowerPC 64-bit. Regards, -- Sérgio Durigan Júnior Linux on Power Toolchain - Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - LTC IBM Brazil