From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27129 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2008 16:02:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27017 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2008 16:02:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:01:39 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.109]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B08390162 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:41:34 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m7IG1aPi1810732 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:37 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7IG1UkI020592 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:30 -0300 Received: from [9.8.8.85] ([9.8.8.85]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7IG1TOV020577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:30 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH-ppc 5/5] Add VSX doc bits From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <1217016956.29012.79.camel@gargoyle> <1218814096.8946.39.camel@gargoyle> <1218823977.8946.49.camel@gargoyle> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1219075291.8946.58.camel@gargoyle> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 21:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Luis Machado > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:12:56 -0300 > > > > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 20:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > This needs to state the node name where the changes are made. > > > > > This is OK, modulo Stan's comments on using "new". > > > > Both should be addressed in the patch below. > > Yes, but... > > > +For POWER7 processors, GDB provides a set of pseudo-registers, the 64-bit > ^^^ > Literal "GDB". Sorry for not catching this the first time. > Fixed and checked in. Thanks. Luis