From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27015 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2008 16:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 27006 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2008 16:02:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:01:38 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.109]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5125D390172 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:41:34 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m7IG1Zii2138116 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:36 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7IG1TDK015840 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:29 -0300 Received: from [9.8.8.85] ([9.8.8.85]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m7IG1SMl015066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:01:29 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH-ppc 3/5] Add VSX support for GDBServer From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080816204008.GA10078@caradoc.them.org> References: <200808141953.m7EJrJgJ027320@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <1218777129.8946.27.camel@gargoyle> <20080816204008.GA10078@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1219075275.8946.56.camel@gargoyle> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 Thanks. Checked in. Luis On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 16:40 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 02:12:09AM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > > Daniel, are you OK with this one? > > Yes, this one's OK too. >