From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13181 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2008 03:42:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13173 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2008 03:42:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:42:05 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9144417F526 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:28:10 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m753fwrV2441574 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:41:58 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m753fqHZ014816 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:41:52 -0300 Received: from [9.18.199.125] ([9.18.199.125]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m753fqSn014550; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:41:52 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080726134252.GA6077@caradoc.them.org> <20080726144138.GA9711@caradoc.them.org> <1217429936.4804.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1217824913.9336.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:42:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1217907691.7578.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 22:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > In that case, my opinion is that the current "Canned Sequences of > > Commands" chapter should be demoted to a section (and its sections would > > then be demoted to subsubsections), and both this section and Python's > > section should be under a chapter called "Extending GDB". > > Agreed. > > > Rereading this thread, I think this is what Daniel suggested in the > > first place. > > And I agreed: > > >> Ok, in that case I have an alternative suggestion: how about renaming > >> the combined scripting chapter, and putting both Python scripting and > >> the existing information in the new chapter? > > > > I have no objections to renaming that chapter. Great, I wasn't sure about the demotion part. I guess I was just dazed and confused. I made that change, then. Now we have a chapter describing both canned commands, and the fresh python scripts. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center