From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8349 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2008 04:44:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 8337 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2008 04:44:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:43:56 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.110]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9742939013F for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:24:37 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m744hfFf3043410 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:43:46 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m744hYpk031453 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:43:35 -0300 Received: from [9.18.199.243] ([9.18.199.243]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m744hYA9031449; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 01:43:34 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <20080615181833.uxmo25mg0kko40kw@imap.linux.ibm.com> <1216107418.14956.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1216245620.12209.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080718195010.GA14356@caradoc.them.org> <1216653969.31797.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080726134252.GA6077@caradoc.them.org> <20080726144138.GA9711@caradoc.them.org> <1217429936.4804.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1217824913.9336.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 20:56 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > In the first sense, it makes sense to put the Python-related > > documentation in the "Canned Sequence of Commands" chapter. In the > > other, it doesn't because it's something different. And the audience of > > each of those is different. > > Sorry, I'm unconvinced. Both features belong to a broader category of > means of extending GDB. In that case, my opinion is that the current "Canned Sequences of Commands" chapter should be demoted to a section (and its sections would then be demoted to subsubsections), and both this section and Python's section should be under a chapter called "Extending GDB". Rereading this thread, I think this is what Daniel suggested in the first place. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center