From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31628 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2008 20:24:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 31620 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2008 20:24:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:24:00 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9893132C133 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:55:21 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m72KNglG1986796 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:23:47 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m72KNaHU020910 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:23:37 -0300 Received: from [9.18.201.209] ([9.18.201.209]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m72KNavS020791; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 17:23:36 -0300 Subject: Re: Subdir ChangeLogs From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Tom Tromey Cc: Eli Zaretskii , stanshebs@earthlink.net, stan@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <487975AF.4030306@codesourcery.com> <48933ABA.2030601@codesourcery.com> <4893474C.3000103@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1217708594.30616.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 10:51 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Most of my patches seem to overlap; many of them touch Makefile.in at > least. Because each patch has to update dependencies in Makefile.in, I figure. This is one more reason to seriously consider your patch which eliminates the need for manual dependency tracking. This is also a problem with my maintaining of 12 patches for Python scripting support... I guess I need to reply a '+1' to that thread. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center