From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5697 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2008 14:15:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5669 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2008 14:15:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:14:56 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85717F767 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:01:39 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m6NE2eng3641544 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:02:58 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6NE2Oaf013782 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:02:24 -0300 Received: from [9.18.201.191] ([9.18.201.191]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6NE2Nql012534; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:02:24 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdbserver] Check for sys/dir.h and sys.user.h in configuration. From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Michael Snyder Cc: Doug Kwan =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E9=97=9C=E6=8C=AF=E5=BE=B7=29?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1216784910.3549.496.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <498552560807221759w1ade0ec2jd63c12475ddb5217@mail.gmail.com> <1216784910.3549.496.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1216821712.5922.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 20:48 -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > I'm surprised by some of the diffs in the generated configure > script -- wonder if you used a different version of autoconf > or something? When I regenerate configure in my system here I get the same spurious diffs that Doug Kwan got. I'm using Debian, with autoconf package version 2.59a-3. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center