From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13380 invoked by alias); 12 May 2008 16:01:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13348 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2008 16:01:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2008 16:00:54 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5681932C0F2 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 12:36:56 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4CG0a951179878 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:36 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4CG0XLF021739 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:33 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.95] (dyn531828.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.95]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4CG0XWQ021732; Mon, 12 May 2008 13:00:33 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 1/9] initial Python support From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080511215110.GA10113@caradoc.them.org> References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.288626880@br.ibm.com> <1209963038.25743.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080505131026.GB27076@caradoc.them.org> <1209996380.25743.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080505144606.GA32577@caradoc.them.org> <1210542361.617.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080511215110.GA10113@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1210608033.617.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 17:51 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Perhaps fiddling with CFLAGS/LDFLAGS is enough anyway? > > I've no opinion. Well, if nobody has a good enough reason, I'll leave it at that, then. The patch 1 in the python series plus the config/override.m4 patch I posted in this thread are all that should be needed configure-wise, IMHO. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center