From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1221 invoked by alias); 5 May 2008 21:47:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 1213 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2008 21:47:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 May 2008 21:46:42 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887CB17F523 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:36:26 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m45KRS8k2306240 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 17:30:10 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m45H1c1e029584 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 14:01:38 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.95] (dyn531828.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.95]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m45H1cmP029581; Mon, 5 May 2008 14:01:38 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 1/9] initial Python support From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080505144606.GA32577@caradoc.them.org> References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> <20080429155304.288626880@br.ibm.com> <1209963038.25743.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080505131026.GB27076@caradoc.them.org> <1209996380.25743.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080505144606.GA32577@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 02:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1210006650.25743.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 10:46 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:06:20AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Would it work work just like --with-libpython2.5-prefix? Why would > > it be less problematic and less complicated? > > Take a look at config/lib-link.m4 and config/lib-prefix.m4. Then > compare to --with-mpfr and --with-mpfr-lib in the top level > configure.ac. Thanks for the pointers. I'll take a look at those and try to come up with something. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center