From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17983 invoked by alias); 3 May 2008 04:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 17974 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2008 04:51:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 May 2008 04:51:05 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55DF17F450 for ; Sat, 3 May 2008 01:40:54 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m434p3U14169912 for ; Sat, 3 May 2008 01:51:03 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m434p1AG023507 for ; Sat, 3 May 2008 01:51:02 -0300 Received: from [9.18.201.233] ([9.18.201.233]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m434p11H023499; Sat, 3 May 2008 01:51:01 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent source file errors in --batch-silent mode From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080502140633.GF29202@caradoc.them.org> References: <480CD958.8010409@st.com> <20080501203347.GT22218@caradoc.them.org> <481AFC65.3070706@st.com> <20080502134418.GC29202@caradoc.them.org> <481B1E6F.7090408@st.com> <20080502140633.GF29202@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 06:23:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1209790046.7034.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:06 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:00:15PM +0100, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > > I think I've been spoilt by makefiles that generate the dependencies > > automatically. :) > > Yeah. The next time there's a break in the furious feature > development GDB's seen lately, and I have some time for > infrastructure work, that is on my list. Nice. > The other items on that list are "move to bugzilla" Nice! > and "switch src to svn 1.5 when it is released", FWIW. Hum... any reason in particular for that? It seems everyone keeps their own version of the GDB source tree. Using a distributed VCS would ease that work and benefit everybody... Besides, there are talks of moving gcc to a DVCS also, no? Or is this flamebait and I've just bitten? :-) -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center