From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23564 invoked by alias); 1 May 2008 16:19:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 23553 invoked by uid 22791); 1 May 2008 16:19:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 May 2008 16:19:28 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9908317F429 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 13:09:21 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m41GJQJV3989720 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 13:19:26 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m41GJPE5010023 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 13:19:25 -0300 Received: from [9.8.5.197] ([9.8.5.197]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m41GJOUf010013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 May 2008 13:19:24 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFC] Entry point update with "run" command From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080426132225.GA16017@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <1209052694.18229.6.camel@gargoyle.br.ibm.com> <20080426132225.GA16017@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1209658765.7131.12.camel@gargoyle> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 The attached patch doesn't fix things in case displaced stepping is being used since the entry point is not updated. Regards, Luis On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 15:22 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > + if (exec_bfd != NULL && strcmp (bfd_get_filename > (objfile->obfd), > + bfd_get_filename > (exec_bfd)) == 0) > + { > + exec_ops.to_open (bfd_get_filename (objfile->obfd), > 0); > + } > +