From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5289 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2008 18:21:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 5281 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2008 18:21:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:20:45 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E6017F4FF for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:10:43 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3TIKfB11736858 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:20:41 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3TIKdlA031465 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:20:40 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.95] (dyn531828.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.95]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3TIKcFh031453; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:20:38 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 0/9] Python support in GDB From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <20080429155212.444237503@br.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1209493060.25413.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00671.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 21:14 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:52:12 -0300 > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > > > This patch series adds Python scripting support to GDB, and exposes > > some of its subsystems hopefully in a "pythonic" way. > > Thanks a lot! > > I presume that you are suggesting these patches for the GDB CVS trunk, > right? That is, it isn't gonna live on some specialized branch, > right? If so, it must be accompanied by some minimal documentation. > We cannot have such a major feature go undocumented. You are right of course, I forgot to talk about this in the e-mail, sorry. The reason there is no documentation right now is that we want to do it after it is clear what will be the final form fo python support. It could be what is in these patches, but it can change based on further discussion. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center