From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15137 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2008 16:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 15127 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2008 16:12:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:11:50 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.109]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C25A390130 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:58:15 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3NGBjpm3580070 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:11:46 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3NGBi02003054 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:11:44 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.95] ([9.18.238.95]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3NGBiLJ003050; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:11:44 -0300 Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3 for GDB-6.8 release (It make I386-Linux GDB support Reversible Debugging) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Tea Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: References: <4805A420.5060807@windriver.com> <1208446046.5808.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1208668151.5808.139.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1208966983.5808.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 Hi Teawater, On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:21 +0800, Tea wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > You said: > > +/*teawater rec begin----------------------------------------------------------*/ > > + int (*intx80_record) (void); > > + int (*sysenter_record) (void); > > +/*teawater rec end------------------------------------------------------------*/ > > The names above are specific to the x86 architecture. tdep members > should have a name which is meaningful accross different architectures. > > I want change it to: > int (*i386_intx80_record) (void); > int (*i386_sysenter_record) (void); > > Cound you please give me some advice? Mmm... I was wrong about that comment. x86's tdep may have (and has) names which wouldn't be meaningful for other arches. I'm sorry about this, hope it didn't cause you much trouble. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center