From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 453 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2008 04:37:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 444 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2008 04:37:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:37:25 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.110]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22AA390025 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:23:58 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3L4bNjw4431896 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:37:23 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3L4bMrs009923 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:37:22 -0300 Received: from [9.12.237.223] ([9.12.237.223]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3L4bJkj009908; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:37:20 -0300 Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] ppc gdbserver: autodetect AltiVec and SPE From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080420142750.GA24305@caradoc.them.org> References: <200803262021.m2QKLTWs019049@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <1208563645.5808.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080419035837.GB22517@caradoc.them.org> <1208667119.5808.126.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080420142750.GA24305@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1208752523.5808.141.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:27 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Is such way of compiling 32-bit GDB in a ppc64 machine with 32-bit > > default gcc not supported? Must one always use --target option to > > configure in such case? > > I see. Anything is supported that we're willing to fix... The > simplest possible fix would be to add the e500 objects. Does > gdbserver work OK with this patch? Yes, it compiled fine. Thanks! -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center