From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17683 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2008 05:11:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 17674 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2008 05:11:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:10:55 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D01D32C002 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:48:10 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m3K5ArLl4227202 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:10:53 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m3K5AqKS005448 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:10:52 -0300 Received: from [9.8.1.114] ([9.8.1.114]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m3K5ApVW005442; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:10:51 -0300 Subject: Re: GDB record patch 0.1.3 for GDB-6.8 release (It make I386-Linux GDB support Reversible Debugging) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Tea Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, hui.zhu@windriver.com In-Reply-To: References: <4805A420.5060807@windriver.com> <1208446046.5808.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1208668151.5808.139.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00418.txt.bz2 Hi Hui Zhu, On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:34 +0800, Tea wrote: > Thanks for your mail very much. It help me a lot. I am beginning to > modify the patch according to your mail. Great! Like Michael Snyder said, this is a very interesting feature, and will be a significant addition to GDB. > I am not very clear about " FSF copyright assignmentin place".Could > you tell me something about it? The Free Software Foundation chooses to retain copyright to all the code in its projects, to ease license control and enforcing. Because of this, contributors to an FSF project need to sign a document assigning the copyright of their code which gets incorporated into a project. You can find some information about it here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html There are people in this list who can send you the paperwork and explain the procedure in detail. I'm not one of them... > BTW: I didn't have any experience on this work. I will have a lot of > questions about it. Please help me. Thanks a lot. That's not a problem. Feel free to post questions and intermediate patches to the list. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center