From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-54596-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8494 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2008 18:40:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 8485 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2008 18:40:25 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:40:08 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) 	by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD20B3C402; 	Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [RFA] Implement -thread-info.
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <frdj9i$mn1$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <200802171833.26673.vladimir@codesourcery.com> 	 <200802181038.04497.vladimir@codesourcery.com> 	 <18361.64577.771676.184618@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> 	 <200802201427.36288.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <fqucs4$upe$2@ger.gmane.org> 	 <frdj9i$mn1$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:40:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1205779206.19253.952.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-7.fc7)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 13:16 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
> > Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > 
> >> I attach the revised version of the patch, including docs. Eli, is the
> >> doc part OK? I intend to commit the code part in a week unless there are
> >> objections.
> > 
> > I have realized that while the patch is mostly about MI, it also
> > touches generic code -- thread.c. Is that part of patch (attached again
> > for convenience) OK?
> 
> Ping?

I'm looking back at your 02/20/08 patch -- is that the correct one?

I noticed that your new version of info_threads_command always
passes -1 to mi_info_threads, but then I checked and saw that
the existing version of info_threads_command also ignores its
argument.  I think that's too bad, but at least it doesn't make
the status quo worse.

That was my only concern so far...