From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7896 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2008 21:54:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 7888 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Feb 2008 21:54:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:53:56 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.109]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18129390028 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:43:26 -0300 (BRST) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m1QLrq9V4042846 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:53:52 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m1QKrqkk030059 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:53:52 -0300 Received: from [9.18.238.95] (dyn531828.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.95]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m1QKrq2Y030049; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:53:52 -0300 Subject: Re: gdb-6.8 branchpoint From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080226213741.GC3894@adacore.com> References: <20080226213741.GC3894@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1204062830.18153.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:37 -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Now that the last known blocking issue has been dealt with, I think > a good branchpoint would be: "2008-02-26 10:00". That's today shortly > after Vladimir checked Nick's change in. > > Unless there are some objections (or other suggestions!), I'll create > the branch later this week, and start the release process. Can this go in as well? http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-02/msg00212.html This was the comment on the patch, I'm not sure if it's an approval or not: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-02/msg00341.html Or I could commit it later in the branch and in HEAD... -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center