From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10836 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 03:20:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 10816 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2008 03:20:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:20:24 +0000 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B439D32C160 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:58:30 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0U3KLw03956874 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:20:21 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0U3KKRs021197 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:20:21 -0200 Received: from [9.18.199.23] ([9.18.199.23]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0U3KKgl021179; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:20:20 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFA] Support for calling functions with decimal float arguments in PowerPC From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches In-Reply-To: <20080130005524.GB25780@caradoc.them.org> References: <1201186561.11950.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080130005524.GB25780@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1201663219.11950.206.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00758.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:55 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 12:56:01PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The attached patch implements the calling convention for decimal > > floating point in ppc32 and ppc64 (arguments and return value), and > > testcases for the new functionality. > > > > This patch introduces no regression (tested in Linux/ppc32 and > > Linux/ppc64). Ok to commit? > > Looks OK to me; go ahead. Thanks! Committed. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center