Re: [OB] comment fix, corelow.c

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>]

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:19 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:11:42 -0800
> > 
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:04 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 05:16:58PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > > cut and paste botch...
> > > 
> > > FYI, no objection, but I think it was right the way it was too...
> > > 
> > > >  	return (*ops->deprecated_xfer_memory) (offset, readbuf,
> > > > -					       len, 0/*write*/, NULL, ops);
> > > > +					       len, 0/*read*/, NULL, ops);
> > > 
> > > The value of the parameter is 0, and its name was write.
> > 
> > I don't think the comment refers to the name of the parameter.
> > 
> > If you look, there are two adjacent calls to xfer_memory:
> > 
> > if (readbuf)
> >   return (*ops->deprecated_xfer_memory) (offset, readbuf,
> >                                          len, 0/*read*/, NULL, ops);
> > if (writebuf)
> >   return (*ops->deprecated_xfer_memory) (offset, (gdb_byte *) writebuf,
> >                                          len, 1/*write*/, NULL, ops);
> > 
> > One call is a read, the other is a write.
> > 
> > None of the other parameters have their names in a comment.
> 
> And if you ask me having those comments is silly in the first place.
> It's much better to have appropriate #defines and use those instead.

Right.  The comments are in lieu of constants.

But by fixing the comment, I did not necessarily volunteer
to fix the lack of constants.   ;-)