From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2416 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 12:49:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2404 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2008 12:49:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:48:58 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1107617F692 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:43:00 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0GCmt4Y4366398 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:48:55 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0GCmtvO014881 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:48:55 -0200 Received: from [9.18.238.41] ([9.18.238.41]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0GCmtLE014878; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:48:55 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix float argument passing in inferior function calls for ppc64 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1200430477.10985.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1200400434.3158.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801151443.m0FEhxN3021953@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1200418789.3158.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1200429235.20287.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801152048.m0FKm0rU027986@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1200430477.10985.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1200487735.32125.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:54 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 21:48 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann > > > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:33:54 -0200 > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:39 -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > > Is the first word used for anything in the new ABI? If not, you could > > > > > support both ABIs by copying the value into both the first and the > > > > > second word. > > > > > > > > Great idea. I will resend the patch using that approach then. > > > > > > What about this patch? > > > > Looks fine to me, but I have no means to test it. > > This is tested in Linux/ppc64. > I'll check this version for regressions (I only regtested the previous > patch). No regressions found. Ok to commit? -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center