From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12280 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2008 02:10:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11844 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2008 02:10:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bluesmobile.specifix.com (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (216.129.118.140) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:10:21 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [216.129.118.140]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87623C77B; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:10:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? From: Michael Snyder To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080115122934.GA7873@caradoc.them.org> References: <1200001622.14654.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> <200801112113.m0BLDnAF024595@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801121531.m0CFVW8I023504@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1200350979.3263.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080115122934.GA7873@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1200449419.3263.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 07:29 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:49:39PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > . *FILENAME:FUNCTION > > > > . *EXPRESSION > > > > > > *FUNCTION and *FILENAME:FUNCTION are just special cases of *EXPRESSION > > > > But important extensions, as they are not part of the target language. > > By the way, has anyone tried *FILENAME:FUNCTION? I'm surprised that > works, since it would have to be part of the C parser. No -- it would have to be part of the LINESPEC parser.