Re: [PATCH 1/4] gdb: make discrete_position return optional

Joel Brobecker
2020-12-08T03:06:41Z

> On 2020-12-06 12:38 a.m., Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > ... that you revision logs have the Change-Id: field, which I assume
> > was for when we were trying Gerrit out. Since it's no longer the case,
> > perhaps you might want to disconnect the hook that adds them
> > automatically?
>
> I use Gerrit myself for tracking the patches I send to GDB. That's the only
> reliable way I found to keep track of patches I've sent that I haven't
> merged yet, so they don't just get lost and forgotten on the list. And I
> presume it doesn't really cause an inconvenience to anybody.

I can only speak for myself, but personally I don't mind. The only
reason I highlighted them is because I thought they were an oversight.

--
Joel