From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4856 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2004 01:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4841 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2004 01:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2004 01:05:33 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7P16vYx001363 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:06:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:05:32 -0700 Received: from [17.201.22.21] (moleja.apple.com [17.201.22.21]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7P15TEV000763; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:05:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <412BA8A2.3000702@gnu.org> References: <4F2AF76A-E71B-11D8-B4BD-000A9569836A@apple.com> <890A6444-E71C-11D8-B4BD-000A9569836A@apple.com> <41129E97.4030207@gnu.org> <412BA8A2.3000702@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v672) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <11D38FA7-F633-11D8-8262-000A9569836A@apple.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy , Mark Kettenis , Eli Zaretskii , Devang Patel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Molenda Subject: Re: RFA/patch stabs reader: Recognize language hint in SO stab Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 01:05:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00681.txt.bz2 On Aug 24, 2004, at 1:44 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote: >>> I knew I forgot something: Testing. >> Can this be turned into a proper testcase? gdb.stabs/ I guess? The >> last thing we want is to accidently break this. > > Jason, > > just so we're all on the same page here, this is a task for the > contributor[s] and not the testsuite maintainer (MichaelC is busy > enough without also implementing these testcases :-). See, my silent answer to his question was "No". So we can move on, right? :) J