From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3085 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2008 19:26:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3075 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2008 19:26:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:25:31 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB1117F541 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:19:47 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0AJPSX54124816 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:25:28 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0AJPSLN008142 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:25:28 -0200 Received: from [9.18.238.251] ([9.18.238.251]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0AJPSxi008139; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:25:28 -0200 Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux-specific ppc32 ABI From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20080110191310.GA1440@caradoc.them.org> References: <1199991624.3343.19.camel@gargoyle> <20080110191310.GA1440@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1199993128.15225.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:13 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:00:24PM -0200, Luis Machado wrote: > > I presume it's better to just write new Linux-specific code in case we > > need to treat those ABI's differently in the future. > > What other target(s) use the existing function? Since I don't see calls to set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call in any OS-specific tdep file, I'd say all OSes supported by GDB on PowerPC. -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center