On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 13:35 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 04:30:45PM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > Mmmm.... sorry about that. What do you think of the attached fix
> > (dangerous question to ask!)?
> > 
> > DOUBLEST_PRINT_FORMAT is currently not used, so not a big deal to change
> > it a bit.
> 
> OK, with changelog entry.  This matches the standard PRIx64 et al,
> too.  Could you update DOUBLEST_SCAN_FORMAT to match?
> 
> > -  ret = asprintf (&buffer, "%.30Lg", value_as_double (from));
> > +  ret = asprintf (&buffer, "%.30"DOUBLEST_PRINT_FORMAT, value_as_double (from));
> 
> Space between " and D.


What about this?
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center