From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20137 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20128 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:09:53 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CA332C130 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:49:13 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m07G9oGG3842224 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:09:50 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m07G9ojj010734 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:09:50 -0200 Received: from [9.18.238.70] (gargoyle.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.70]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m07G9nCa010729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:09:50 -0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC atomic single stepping testcase From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1198002422.1209.6.camel@gargoyle> References: <200712042316.lB4NGkjV014646@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <1197305093.2060.17.camel@gargoyle> <20071216222531.GA6846@caradoc.them.org> <1198002422.1209.6.camel@gargoyle> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1199722187.31933.4.camel@gargoyle.br.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 Any comments on this one? Regards, On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 16:27 -0200, Luis Machado wrote: > Fixed with all the points you've mentioned. Is this OK or is there a > more robust way to check if GDB hangs while stepping through the > sequences? > > Best regards, > -- Luis Machado Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center