From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32512 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2007 20:32:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32329 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2007 20:32:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:32:07 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D7A32C1F1 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:29:35 -0200 (BRDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.47]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9PKW4CR2564224 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:32:04 -0200 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9PKVx9R021283 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:04 -0300 Received: from dyn531757.br.ibm.com ([9.18.238.24]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9PKVwep021261; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:31:58 -0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC Call-clobbered registers testcase From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20071025192332.GA2690@caradoc.them.org> References: <1190644886.4375.2.camel@localhost> <1190726512.4376.0.camel@localhost> <20071006161230.GA10179@caradoc.them.org> <1191869140.4322.10.camel@localhost> <20071008185507.GA28479@caradoc.them.org> <1191870400.4322.13.camel@localhost> <20071008191416.GA30019@caradoc.them.org> <1193180757.5333.3.camel@localhost> <20071024205901.GS10943@caradoc.them.org> <1193339127.4850.16.camel@localhost> <20071025192332.GA2690@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1193344312.4850.27.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00675.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:23 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:05:27PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > > Took a different path as you suggested. The synching is being done via > > matching with the $gdb_prompt at the end of every test. This way it > > works flawlessly on both x86 and ppc. Passes 3 tests on ppc and passes 2 > > and fails 1 on x86. > > What fails on x86? Well, I can look at it after it's in. > > This is the right way to sync. > > + -re "\\\$$decimal = \r\n$gdb_prompt" { pass "print operand1"} > > "$gdb_prompt $" there please. Ok to commit otherwise. > Thanks, i've checked this in. -- Luis Machado IBM Linux Technology Center e-mail: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com