From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25425 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2007 21:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25417 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2007 21:40:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw2.br.ibm.com (HELO igw2.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:40:53 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (mailhub3 [9.18.232.110]) by igw2.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B409017F76E for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:38:10 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l95Len1m2232536 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:40:49 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l95LemkR000421 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:40:48 -0300 Received: from dyn532128.br.ibm.com (dyn532128.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.251]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l95LemkG000418; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:40:48 -0300 Subject: Re: [rfc] Use target descriptions for PowerPC From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20071005163754.GA26041@caradoc.them.org> References: <20071005163754.GA26041@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1191620446.18959.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 12:37 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > + /* If we have a 64-bit binary on a 32-bit target, complain. Also > + complain for a 32-bit binary on a 64-bit target; we do not yet > + support that. */ > + if (tdesc_wordsize != -1 && tdesc_wordsize != wordsize) > + { > + tdesc_data_cleanup (tdesc_data); > + return NULL; > + } Sorry if I am confusing things here. This sounds like it affects 64 bit GDB debugging 32 bit binary. Is this the case? Or only for remote debugging? -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center