From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: kevinb@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] More file-name related fixes
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <1190-Thu03May2001000950+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <3791-Wed02May2001202656+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <1010502202816.ZM3883@ocotillo.lan>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00016.html

> Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 13:28:16 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
> 
> On May 2,  8:26pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > +#if 0
> > +
> >  static struct sym_and_file {
> >    char *sym;
> >    char *file;
> > @@ -3352,6 +3340,8 @@ make_file_symbol_completion_list (char *
> >    return (return_val);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#endif
> > +
> 
> Is there any reason for leaving the code disabled by the #if 0
> in place?

As I wrote in a follow-up, this hunk should be disregarded.  It
doesn't belong to this change (I was experimenting with something when
I ran Diff), and got into my message through my own negligence.
Sorry.

Thanks for reviewing the patch.