From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23514 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2003 21:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23507 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2003 21:40:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2003 21:40:45 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (cable-129-113.inter.net.il [213.8.129.113]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AUX93437; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:40:35 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:40:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <1190-Sat07Jun2003004105+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3EE0ECD0.30601@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 06 Jun 2003 15:34:40 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch rfc; rfa:doco] frame_sp_unwind Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3EE0ECD0.30601@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 15:34:40 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Eli, note the doco change. Thanks for the heads-up. The doco patch is approved, but please make the words "stack pointer" be in @dfn in this sentence: > This is commonly refered to as the frame's stack pointer. That's because you are in effect introducing a new term here.