From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24415 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2007 18:45:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 24403 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2007 18:45:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw3.br.ibm.com (HELO igw3.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:45:29 +0000 Received: from mailhub3.br.ibm.com (unknown [9.18.232.110]) by igw3.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F85C390188 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:35:19 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub3.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l5CIj8fE1245254 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:45:10 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5CIgZqc017172 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:42:36 -0300 Received: from dyn532128.br.ibm.com (dyn532128.br.ibm.com [9.18.238.251]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5CIgZSQ017168; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:42:35 -0300 Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] [RFC] decimal floating point support From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Luis Machado , gdb-patches In-Reply-To: <20070606191039.GA24587@caradoc.them.org> References: <1175012961.21904.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1176495589.13824.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070424214013.GA5173@caradoc.them.org> <1180010972.8620.4.camel@localhost> <20070606191039.GA24587@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1181673907.13504.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 15:10 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:49:32AM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Do we have any news on the reviewing process of this DFP patch? I was > > thinking of refreshing for latest HEAD and re-submitting, and if anyone > > has suggestions on it i'd like to include on the newer version. > > I had not gotten around to looking at it. If you want to resubmit, > I'll try to be prompter. Are there bits to make GDB depend on > libdecnumber at build time already, or should I take care of that when > we merge libdecnumber to src? I'm not completely sure what you mean by "make GDB depend on libdecnumber", but the first patch in the series ( http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-03/msg00251.html ) adds the bits necessary for GDB to pick up the libdecnumber library file (.a) and header files from src/libdecnumber/, but it doesn't modify the top-level Makefile.in in src/ to compile the library automatically... I'm not sure how would I do that. Maybe adding some maybe-*-libdecnumber targets? -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann Software Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center