From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yEnMDn45bGK3WgMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:16:14 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 30A551E058; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:16:14 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=gz01YGmW; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0701E00E for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:16:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB573857415 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:16:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9CB573857415 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1651259772; bh=MxH8dkWw5jyQm73xMembi+PIw79IJOPI8vnK37vEQzY=; h=To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=gz01YGmWbbza7wJt4nm689Qm2Ehs1cj9HGqngZlH5IqD3rpKtubzeXR/gfyzRlfJS 5HaC220hp9HEN2EMgNXKVHbtM6Pdt+JGgwvigmX6eTC9Tn24anaBmKY6OOnJz84zb2 ke35qI0lBDbcla0v2/POzML7FHmFg2lfyQIb485Y= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944993858D28 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:15:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 944993858D28 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 23TJDcXx016064; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:50 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3frp07r01v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:50 +0000 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 23TJDnxC016380; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:49 GMT Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3frp07r01n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:49 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 23TJ8nXG012895; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:48 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.20]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3fm93bej1k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:48 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 23TJDkiF22806884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:46 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0F878064; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0007805C; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.152.172]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:13:46 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <117e54956e10755d19aeff2936600dfb89f3b1cf.camel@us.ibm.com> To: Pedro Alves , Keith Seitz , Lancelot SIX Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:13:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <5ee342cd5f5272da9970da8a077c2c5209b85d6c.camel@us.ibm.com> <20220429091234.62xhprge74gfpgks@ubuntu.lan> <4610920e52ea1bbeb5181c970887eb7cfe344f1a.camel@us.ibm.com> <032437ea-2ef4-90f5-7b96-8a729bae2252@redhat.com> <31261461-8f2a-8919-c882-3601a9adefd9@palves.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: GdksRE--k2P608MVvnkOGRLD48i5o4UV X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: A3EguspXD9q0uYil1b9fOo7q7Z7qlIsv Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix gdb.cp/no-dmgl-verbose.exp test X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-29_09,2022-04-28_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=911 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204290099 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Carl Love Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Rogerio Alves Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" GDB maintaners, Pedro, Lancelot: I am not much of a C++ programer. I will have to admit that there is a fair bit of the deep C++ behaviour with old/new APIs in Pedro's post that is beyond me. :-) Sorry. Additionally, there is concern that the name of the test is not accurate, etc. So at this point, not sure where to go with fixing this test. I seem to have opened a real can of worms. Suggestions on how to move forward, remove the test, go with a minimal change to get the test to pass, do a rewrite/name change, .... ? Carl Love