From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29196 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2007 23:47:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 29176 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Apr 2007 23:47:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from igw1.br.ibm.com (HELO igw1.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:46:58 +0100 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com (mailhub1 [9.18.232.109]) by igw1.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E46148045 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:36:11 -0300 (BRT) Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.46]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3SNkqeo1159256 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:46:52 -0300 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3SNipl0001793 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:44:51 -0300 Received: from [9.18.198.122] ([9.18.198.122]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3SNinri001786; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:44:51 -0300 Subject: Re: [RFC] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole on PPC From: Luis Machado Reply-To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200704282336.l3SNatuE012606@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <200704282336.l3SNatuE012606@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1177804008.6280.66.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 Oops. Sorry about that Ulrich. I'll re-work it based on your modification for the single stepping routines. Luis On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 01:36 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Luis Machado wrote: > > > +static int > > +deal_with_atomic_sequence (enum target_signal sig, int insert_breakpoints_p) > > This doesn't actually work on mainline any more, the software_single_step > API was changed: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-04/msg00218.html > > Please update your patch accordingly. > > Bye, > Ulrich >